dirtydancing

And it would still have to be tested whether not inheriting from GNOME actually solves this issue. In theory it should, but to me on first sight this looks like...

Well, I am not quite sure what is going on here, and probably someone who is actually running Gnome Shell should have a look at this: in a first test...

Looking at this latest pull request from @wa4557, Numix base now seems to cover Ubuntu completely :) https://github.com/numixproject/numix-icon-theme/pull/486

I might be missing s.th. here, but why are only the "symbolic"-named icons in GNOME of relevance when determining whether Numix base is up to the task of not inheriting...

Ah, I see now, completely misunderstood the list above. Those are the icons displayed for the active application :)

I do not understand the linked post https://plus.google.com/+WorldofGnomeOrg/posts/ZEbfygDA4sk. "symbolic: Try to draw a symbolic icon. If no symbolic icon can be found looking at all possible icon names, fall back...

Well, from what I can tell, the "symbolic"-named icons can be colour-themed by the GTK theme. So no matter which colour such an icon might have, apparently it is then...

Btw, such monochrome "colour-themeing" of "symbolic"-named icons probably also means that adding "symbolic"-named symlinks pointing to the regular-named app icons as targets would not work: these symlinks, because they are...

Agreed that disabling the top bar active app icon requires individual manual intervention from the user and cannot be done via Numix icon theme. The same goes for setting the...

And btw, as this issue came up for Moka icon theme, cf. above: on my Ubuntu machine (versions via PPA), Moka icon theme inherits from Faba icon theme, and Faba...