Dirk Roorda

So we only have to add `/all/` at the beginning of the template we want to quantify. It almost sounds doable! And it sounds right too for all quantifiers: ```...

Why do we need the extra /-/ ?

This should be possible too: ``` w1:word /all/ < w2:word /without/ < word pdp=prep < w2 /-/ ```

I think you need an extra /all/ for that. But I have to admit that I should sleep on this one first

This is a resumption of #9.

I am not able to follow this up in the foreseeable future.

Nice thing to have indeed. Let's try to think how this might work. The user uploads data to the server. The TF kernel converts the csv data into a bunch...

The TF engine can load data on the fly. It will need to do precomputing. That means, care should be taken that not two users upload the same features. This...

I have not come round to it. It is an interesting thing to have, especially the rapid development using the TF browser is a good use case, because it is...

Here is a proposal: the relational operators ``, `~~`, defined as follows `x