Add user limits

[licitdev]

Scope

What's changed:

• Added user limits for Admin, App and API accesses

Potential Risks / Drawbacks

• Needs further testing for edge cases

Review Notes / Questions

• WIP tests

---

Implements the limits mentioned in issue #21981 for Public Registration #22125

[changeset-bot[bot]]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: cbb4d231d370db0211cbe81aa1e1757f7cd7b59f

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 7 packages

Name	Type
@directus/api	Minor
@directus/env	Patch
@directus/errors	Patch
directus	Patch
@directus/extensions-registry	Patch
@directus/memory	Patch
@directus/validation	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[phazonoverload]

Don't forget additions to the docs config page please.

Edit: Ignore me - they're there.

[hanneskuettner]

Mhh we dont seem to be checking in updateBatch for the RolesService while we do checks in both updateOne and updateMany - but - the batch update just calls super.updateBatch so I think we can circumvent our checks there? 🤔

But ItemsService.updateBatch calls RolesService.updateOne and ItemService.updateByQuery calls RolesService.updateMany

[DanielBiegler]

But ItemsService.updateBatch calls RolesService.updateOne

But it instantiates a new generic ItemsService in there?

https://github.com/directus/directus/blob/47c438b4e3e2611f16ab372bea66d6396cd13cca/api/src/services/items.ts#L552-L584

Does that still call RolesServices' functions over its own somehow @hanneskuettner ?

[hanneskuettner]

But it instantiates a new generic ItemsService in there?

Ugh you're right. One more level of indirection that I thought about. Good catch... :)

[br41nslug]

When testing ms sql too much bites u in the ass 😬 give it another try @paescuj