Davanum Srinivas
Davanum Srinivas
@laurazard @samuelkarp Does the test case in the other draft PR https://github.com/containerd/containerd/pull/10649/files#diff-c42347ed8e4d506171a89d185fa64603384764b94b8a8477c7d797ae49419050R1577 useful to put in this PR itself?
LGTM, looks like @cpuguy83 has a few more comments
xref: https://github.com/containerd/containerd/pull/10603
`kubectl exec` or `crictl exec` cause goroutine and thus memory leak when using WebSocket connection
containerd 1.6 depends on [email protected], containerd 1.7 on [email protected]. Also the websocket logic was moved from [email protected] to apimachinary. Since those versions of kubernetes are out-of-support/end-of-life in the community, we...
@kiashok will you be picking this up again?
@Nit123 go for it!
xref: https://github.com/containernetworking/cni/issues/1055
xref: https://github.com/k3s-io/k3s/issues/6185
> I think given the policy I'd be open to taking the CNI dependency change to 1.2.0 in release/1.7. Curious what other maintainers think. @samuelkarp +1 from me
@michelleN can you confirm if we can close out https://github.com/cncf/sandbox/issues/90 for SpinKube? (and that will be part of this proposal itself?)