D-mo

> if it isn't in jammy's ffmpeg why go to a lot of effort to enable all the new codecs and stuff in a backport to jammy? imo just disable...

> > > if it isn't in jammy's ffmpeg why go to a lot of effort to enable all the new codecs and stuff in a backport to jammy? imo...

Waiting for #1560 to be accepted.

> I am not 100% sold on this currently. I know that it is the proper thing to do, but the duplication of the patches in both here and the...

@Julusian I've trimmed the patch down a little bit. It still adds 13 lines of code overall, but in the grand scheme of things, it pushes some of the noise...

> One thing to figure out here is should the package be called 'cef' or 'casparcg-cef'? I've opted for `libcef117` because we are not doing anything caspar-specific and the package...

> I'm still not sure whether I agree that libcef being reusable is good, or whether I prefer to have it isolated/namespaced. @Julusian you are right to be concerned --...