Dimitri Fontaine
Dimitri Fontaine
Where are we on that? Is it still needed?
It sounds a little crazy / overboard, but I would accept such a feature when off by default. Do you want to work on it?
This behavior has been made for backward compatibility purposes, when I changed the recipe files from .el to .rcp, around el-get 1.x or 2.x or something like that. It might...
That seems like a good idea, do you want to cook up a patch?
What about nested git submodules? Does that work? We would need support for that in order to even evaluate the merits of that idea...
So we can have el-get git packages registered as emacs.d git submodules even if they themselves use submodules, nice. What about svn or mercurial or other sources, will we check...
In my view el-get recipes allow better default setup and client-side behaviour. I still think the best way forward would be merging MELPA and el-get somehow, as we said with...
Well, that would be good, yes.
Some people are only using a single workstation and will happily `M-x el-get-install` and never setup an `el-get-sources` or such. One can even handle a bunch of `package-init.el` files for...