Shubhamkar Ayare

### 3. Multiple python processes managed by lisp So, this is another idea. We keep multiple python processes managed by lisp, similar to how lparallel maintains a kernel (thread-pool?), and...

If multiple python processes approach is to be considered, indeed, something analogous to worker-pool would be the first attempt. Anything less than that would be inconvenient. The lisp-caller will need...

Being more familiar with lisp, I feel the multiple processes approach would be easier - and perhaps even better in performance - and perhaps lparallel might even have ready-made tools...

If the multiple python processes approach is to be considered, I'd ideally like to go for premise (B). However - > how should it behave when the users import a...

> foreign objects X and Y are stored in python-process px and py respectively I had initially thought that the only way such objects can exist is if `raw-pyexec` was...

> If you are willing to, would you share some of what you learned from that. I myself haven't read the paper yet. I shared it in the hopes you...

I have nothing to add to the sections on Threading and burgled-batteries, I agree with you. About cffi and py4cl2: My current understanding is that there are four ways of...

Given the discussion [here](https://github.com/pinterface/burgled-batteries/issues/15), it seems burgled batteries aimed for an even "deeper" integration. My current understanding and a little experience playing around is that the jump between the "shallow"...

> I'd like to clarify where you vision we are heading to. I won't say I have a very clear vision where this will go. The primary thing I'd like...

This should be fixed with the latest commit 45f63b08d9c97ce8144c443924bee3859582a80a and the associated tag.