Dietmar Winkler
Dietmar Winkler
I would also be in favour of having the verification settings separate from the simulation model but referenced from within the simulation model. So basically @beutlich's option 3.
@lvanfretti Is this still an open issue?
I've updated the ticket though it is not really of relevance since this should work on windows and linux ;-)
OK doing the same test when using the OMEdit interface I get: ``` $ readelf -d static_FMU/binaries/linux64/TestFMU.so | grep 'NEEDED' 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libm.so.6] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libpthread.so.0]...
So just to recap. | option | current action | proposed fix | | --- | --- | --- | | none | creates static FMU | remove? | |...
So maybe rename "none" to "source-code only" and at the same time deactivate the platform checkboxes if that option is chosen? If you keep dynamic then you also need to...
Right, I was only thinking of the Windows targets.
> @dietmarw you wrote "fix the dynamic generation for Linux" but what I understood from @AnHeuermann comment that it is working fine on Linux. Or did I miss something? It...
So I just double checked. Dynamic only works when running the commands in OMShell. Not when triggered from inside OMEdit.
I run the exact same commands that @AnHeuermann listed. I could not find any `omeditcommunication.log` file to be created but I can attach the FMU file which contains plenty of...