bitmask-core
bitmask-core copied to clipboard
diba-io
WIP/Docker test volumes
Testing the run command against the Dockerfile with:
docker run -d --restart always -p 7060:7070 -v /Applications/bitmask/bitmask-core/target/release:/app -v /var/lib/docker/volumes/my_data_volume:/_data --name bitmaskd-st160 -t bitmaskd-st160-image:Rc.17 -e “CARBONADO_DIR=/data”
the volume mounts allow for updating source code, at the same time, writing to the volume data mount
Final docker RUN command
THIS WRITES TO /mnt/storage/carbonado-docker
docker run -it --user root --restart always -p 7060:7070 --mount type=bind,source=/mnt/storage/carbonado-docker,target=/tmp/bitmaskd/carbonado --name bitmaskd-st160 -t bitmaskd-st160-image:Rc.0.6.2 -e “CARBONADO_DIR=/data” bash
Alright, that technically gets the job done, but it's inelegant. Can you make it check runtime env vars to set CARBONADO_DIR to /data/bitmaskd/carbonado/ ? Heck, I think that's fine to set even at compile time.
Had to move ENV to runtime in order for rust to pick it up in Carbonado-Core
Runtime
FROM rust:1.69-slim-buster AS runtime
ENV CARBONADO_DIR=/data/bitmaskd/carbonado/
Hunter, I will double check but I believe in regards to docker we where at 1.71 Rust , but had issues, that caused us to degrade back to 1.69.. I can pull the latest and rebuild and test. I was focused on the AWS infrastructure until now, But can double back on Bitmask Core, tomorrow. I will be working on Saturday. Wesley
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 6:58 AM Hunter Beast @.***> wrote:
@.**** requested changes on this pull request.
Can we see if CI passes if this is updated against the latest development branch?
Also, I'd like to upgrade to the latest stable version of Rust, 1.71.1.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/diba-io/bitmask-core/pull/307#pullrequestreview-1584524466, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATWG7QTWLHS6UZ42ZCCJNJDXV5RF5ANCNFSM6AAAAAA24YLK5Y . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>