Dmitry Gozman

@nickofthyme No good news, unfortunately. Overall, this sounds like a docker issue. It is expected that arm docker image vs intel docker image produce different screenshots - after all, they...

@KotlinIsland There's not much we can suggest here. Screenshots in the browser are asynchronous, complicated and time consuming, so there are no guarantees that it happens very fast, especially when...

We have updated the Firefox after the large refactoring, as an example it fixed #9840, so let's see how it will behave with the next v1.28.0 release. I'll close this...

Closing per above.

@neg3ntropy Could you share a repro that illustrates the issue, so that we can run it locally?

@ankur-lt Could you please explain your usecase? See also issue #1523 for a similar discussion.

@ankur-lt Thank you for the explanation. This sounds like a possible scenario, but there are no plans to support it for now. I'll leave this feature request open for further...

@Janpot This indeed does not work. The workaround is to either not use dynamic imports, or set `"type": "module"` in your `package.json`. Perhaps in the future we'll make it work...

@dimkin-eu Any thoughts on the above?

@dimkin-eu I understand your proposal. However, we still would like to know whether you have considered running a server per worker? As a workaround, you can achieve the pause behavior...