ar5iv icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
ar5iv copied to clipboard

Improve article 1711.09600

Open isomorphisms opened this issue 3 years ago • 2 comments

Only in the vanity version (not 5), the following lines become extremely wide:

f:X→S of compact complex surfaces over a smooth 1–dimensional manifold S, whose general fiber is smooth and whose finitely many special fibers only have singularities of the type A1, has a simultaneous resolution. Here, a simultaneous resolution of a general holomorphic mapping f:X→S is a commutative diagram of holomorphic maps

f:X=f−1(S)∩B→S with B=Bε and S=Dδ from the previous section. The non–singular Milnor fibre Xs=f−1(s) is a deformation of X0=f−1(0), the simplest deformation since it is given by f itself. The Milnor fibre is the singularity-theoretic explanation for the fact that Brieskorn’s exotic spheres bound parallelizable manifolds. However, it does not yet explain how these parallelizable manifolds can be constructed by plumbing. This requires a somewhat more complicated deformation, a so-called morsification. The idea dates back to the two volumes Théorie of the fonctions algébriques de deux variables indépendantes by Picard-Simart published in 1897 and 1906, and to the monograph L’analysis situs et la géométry algébrique by Lefschetz. It was later developed into the local Picard–Lefschetz theory, to which Brieskorn contributed in 1970 in the appendix to [12].

In the 5 version, by contrast, lines are cut off mid-word to prevent the overflow.

This is Firefox on Windows 10.


Thought you would find that interesting.

isomorphisms avatar Aug 22 '22 23:08 isomorphisms

@isomorphisms can you also tell me your screen resolution? Just to be sure I don't miss it when debugging the mid-word cutoffs.

dginev avatar Aug 22 '22 23:08 dginev

And also, for arxiv-vanity issues you can always add more reports to the engrafo project at: https://github.com/arxiv-vanity/engrafo/issues

Best to keep the sites separate, since they only share using (different versions of) latexml.

dginev avatar Aug 22 '22 23:08 dginev

The article looks reasonable in the latest ar5iv, closing here. As mentioned above, you're welcome to open a separate vanity issue.

dginev avatar Jan 09 '23 19:01 dginev