Paul Gschwendtner
Paul Gschwendtner
@JeanMeche should we add `action: review` if the PR still has pending reviewers?
This PR was merged into the repository by commit a89fd30690ef34e2c80cf4e4266e7f2e74d28e3b. The changes were merged into the following branches: main, 18.2.x
Initializer APIs (input, output, queries) not integrating with `TestBed.override` in a jit & aot mix
@alxhub yeah, we'd need to convert the extracted metadata into a decorator basically, unless we start introducing a whole new parameter for "initializer APIs— Ideally we'd use the JIT transforms...
Awesome, thank you! will this rate limiting be removed in the future? (you mentioned it as being "temporary")
I don't seem to get these 500 errors anymore, thanks! On the other hand, I see some QUIC errors and larger files from e.g. `@angular/compiler` end up being never cached...
Rebased but this got conflicted again. I will merge myself tomorrow morning.
This PR was merged into the repository by commit e98ef808aa3bb293cb8e04e3c70500414863f3dd. The changes were merged into the following branches: 20.0.x
We're using Web Test Runner via https://github.com/devversion/rules_browsers with Puppeteer, but it's also not super great— but at least allows us to stay on the Jasmine test runner (which simply runs...
@mollyibot depends on which interactions you need. This ruleset is mostly for our Angular needs, but it supports WTR (as Karma replacement) + there is a rule for Protractor testing....
I agree that we could add a TODO, or skip in "safe mode", but IMO it would also be acceptable to say that we are intentionally breaking here and surfacing...