snek

@mcollina yeah we could implement repl using runtime.evaluate now, just no one has gotten around to it.

I don't think it requires complete reimplementation but it will definitely require some work

Been a few months here so I'm assuming the behavior isn't being seen anymore.

I started to strawman this out a bit: https://gist.github.com/devsnek/9686da77db0421927c84e862bd70b214 one of my main goals with this approach is to sort of streamline everything into one neat api that's small so...

~~timer improvements seems like something that could be part of the task api, unless that's too far along at this point or too narrowly scoped?~~ nvm you had the same...

there used to be a util to call runtime/abstract ops from inside js by prefixing them with `%`, like `%IsCallable(f)`, in which case it was useful for them to return...

I'm curious about being able to tell the difference between a relative input like "in 30 minutes" which resolves to an certain datetime vs an explicitly typed out absolute certain...

It seems this is now stuck in `op_spawn_sync` ``` * frame #0: 0x00007ffff7d8939d libc.so.6`__poll + 77 frame #1: 0x0000555561093ff0 deno`std::sys::pal::unix::pipe::read2::hb5bb65a4a4d94c5c [inlined] std::sys::pal::unix::pipe::read2::_$u7b$$u7b$closure$u7d$$u7d$::heac52a63958bf671 at pipe.rs:105:27 frame #2: 0x0000555561093fe0 deno`std::sys::pal::unix::pipe::read2::hb5bb65a4a4d94c5c [inlined] std::sys::pal::unix::cvt_r::h9d3c44b85170f181...

@sffc i think we discussed something like this at one point... do you think diplomat could be up to the task?

this is to do with the actual abi that represents those arguments. the four args are (fd, iovs base pointer, iovs length, bytes written pointer) and the return value is...