David Widmann
David Widmann
Ref https://github.com/SciML/SciMLSensitivity.jl/issues/281 AFAIK there's no support for DDEs in SciMLSensitivity yet.
My worry (that was also expressed in issues such as https://github.com/JuliaStats/Distributions.jl/issues/968) is that generally numerical integration is challenging and a fallback might lead to silently incorrect results. It seems such...
Oh yes, indeed, it seems I commented on the wrong PR.
Indeed, this seems to be a bug. `randn(rng)` should probably be changed to `randn(rng, typeof(z))`.
> I'm not at all against the idea that eltype(d) should equal partype(d) That's absolutely not the idea here. In the case of `TDist`, we get a sample from ChiSq...
Hmmmm that's annoying, that leads directly to all the `eltype` inconsistencies 😄 Initially - and for basically all distributions apart from `Normal` - `eltype` and `partype` were two completely different...
Sorry, I missed your previous comment. > Add support for InverseFunctions / ChangesOfVariables Since this PR adds new functions, we should also add definitions of `InverseFunctions.inverse` to https://github.com/JuliaStats/LogExpFunctions.jl/blob/289114f535827c612ce10c01b8dec9d3a55e4d15/ext/LogExpFunctionsInverseFunctionsExt.jl and definitions...
As mentioned in #1870, I'm not sure yet if it's worth to make this change.
It's clearly a quite general term - but IMO that's not a problem per se. I think the existence of the same (exported) name in some other package is not...
We can't unexport them in a non-breaking release and there are no plans for a breaking release in the near future.