Alex Siryi

Current implementation of `nexti` for ticks is not perfect: since `nexti` is a step-over, it essentially just places a breakpoint after the call instruction. But that call might never return...

I've pushed 8c86065e1e0688e2c6355a969d6d82f86a08a195 to do exactly that. Please make sure your stack is in good condition and there is no problems with your program. here's an example of program that...

Does it work without clib argument? I think the reason is, only sccz80 might have the debug support unfortunately, @suborb correct me if I'm wrong?

That's because this package declares version 0.4.33 even though it is deployed as 0.4.35 https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/71/ce/d566d1c22fbf40c5b70dbd2e032996deeeeb450c631dff231e0f40941f6b/onnxsim-0.4.35.tar.gz has inconsistent version: expected '0.4.35', but metadata has '0.4.33'

Having the same as well. `tornado-redis (2.4.18)` / `tornado (4.2.1)`

Just came here to say thank you for your effort! Don't really have any issues now, but yet it would be nice to have more recent version of V8 just...

Would be awesome to hear status from flier himself, because there wasn't much updates lately.

Added also a timeout to `context.eval`: ```python try: context.eval(text, "", -1, -1, None, 500L) except JSTimeoutError: raise RuntimeError("Evaluation timeout!") ```

@buffer as you don't have issues here I'd like also to mention that there's a serious issues with threading [here](https://github.com/buffer/pyv8/blob/master/src/Wrapper.cpp#L923), `static` doesn't go well when you create object template in...

@buffer looks good, does it have threading support? Is it production ready?