Lukasz Gornicki
Lukasz Gornicki
Definitely. Can be both but as 2 separate issues
Thanks, you it be possible for you to open a PR and fix https://github.com/asyncapi/template-for-generator-templates/blob/master/package.json#L68 config ?
@Tenischev there is a problem. For some reason PR testing workflows are not set as mandatory to merge a PR so this went through: https://github.com/asyncapi/java-spring-template/pull/424 but it should not, as...
@Tenischev not sure if you had a chance to see my comment
thanks for the issue, so basically even though the message type is a tuple of `string` and `null` the example with `"message": null` throws an issue, but if you change...
thanks for the issue the problem is that even if we get a report that there are errors, we need to find someone who has time to fix it. wouldn't...
ok, so my assumption was your rather suggesting validation of codeowners from technical point of view, if data there is accurate, etc but you mean also issues when someone changed...
some strange duplicate at https://deploy-preview-2710--asyncapi-website.netlify.app/finance that is not on prod 
is this basically a proposal to what is workaround with https://github.com/asyncapi/spec/issues/1102?
are you basically suggesting something that in JSON Schema is known as `$id` ?