Deoren Moor

@rgerhards I'm slow this morning, still working on my responses to your earlier responses. I'll catch up with you in a moment. ;)

We could just limit ourselves to 140 characters ;)

> @rgerhards: @deoren Our main objective is to have the new code running under the same style as the site -- right? Anything else? Two objectives (at least for me):...

> @rgerhards DM'ed you on twitter, but maybe it is better to keep it here as a record of decision making -- all has pros and cons... Definitely a good...

> @rgerhards: ACK on staying here. > >> @deoren: Two objectives (at least for me): >> >> Test integration with the main site >> Test results as stand-alone output >...

@rgerhards I think I understand the potential of CI and I actually can really appreciate how useful it is for checking results, but I'm not yet aware of how it...

Ah, I see what you mean. That is powerful and likely does what I was thinking of so much better. Using a scheduled build approach seems like it is from...

After giving this some more thought, I think it may be worth sticking with the established style that the Sphinx project uses for their own documentation. I'm not a fan...

> @rgerhards: I myself would appreciate if we had a simple README or CONTRIB (or whatever) document that spells out how the rsyslog-doc project uses it. Me too, actually. I...

That makes sense. Do you see the reference being over to the imuxsock doc or a future systemd doc (or primary section in a doc about the various different platforms)?