pcp icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
pcp copied to clipboard

brew package conflict with PCP - Perfomance CoPilot

Open ciphernaut opened this issue 3 years ago • 14 comments

the package entry in brew conflicts with Performance CoPilot.

See https://github.com/performancecopilot/pcp/blob/main/INSTALL.md "section 2. Mac OS X Installation" for more information.

ciphernaut avatar Nov 26 '21 00:11 ciphernaut

This is unfortunate - the package name conflict is going to exist on all Linux distributions as well, where the other PCP has been around for some 20+ years.

natoscott avatar Nov 26 '21 01:11 natoscott

Seems to be an issue with other package managers as well as per https://github.com/dennis-tra/pcp/issues/11

ciphernaut avatar Nov 26 '21 04:11 ciphernaut

Hey hey, yup this is really unfortunate because I actually liked the name. I hope this has not caused a lot of trouble on your side as managing dependencies can often be a pain. I have not yet come around to actually changing it - if the only alternative is a change in the name my current favorite alternative would be peercp as suggested by @AmberCronin in the other issue.

Would you know another sensible way forward that would not require a change in the name? If not, would you have other naming suggestions?

dennis-tra avatar Nov 26 '21 11:11 dennis-tra

I am not familiar enough with the brew landscape to comment on how to achieve that.

'peercp' does appear that it would alleviate namespace clashes via brew and other in other packaging formats such as rpm.

ciphernaut avatar Nov 30 '21 05:11 ciphernaut

regarding rpms, this is the official advice for handling package name clashes in Fedora - and hence CentOS/RHEL, as downstream projects: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts#Conflicting_Package_Names

natoscott avatar Nov 30 '21 06:11 natoscott

go-pcp on the distro side? pcp is a rad name.

decentral1se avatar Feb 21 '22 23:02 decentral1se

Hi Dennis, I second the name peercp, is it possible to change the name?

Thanks

safeercm avatar Feb 24 '22 18:02 safeercm

Hi, I'd like to propose "pcpft" pcp => peer copy ft => file transfer

In my opinion that makes it easier to remember the name since thats what you wanna do.

dhalucario avatar Mar 09 '22 09:03 dhalucario

I am (with the help of @optman 👏) preparing a new version that will support decentralized hole punching. This will probably/hopefully vastly improve transfer speeds as two peers in their home networks will be able to directly connect to each other (as opposed to routing the traffic through a relay). Before releasing this new version I'll figure out a solution for this naming clash 👍

dennis-tra avatar Mar 10 '22 09:03 dennis-tra

@dennis-tra thanks!!!

natoscott avatar Mar 10 '22 21:03 natoscott

@dennis-tra hi - any news on this one? We have folks working on updating the pcp.io Mac port and they'll no doubt encounter this issue in the weeks ahead. Many thanks!

natoscott avatar Sep 20 '22 04:09 natoscott

@dennis-tra any traction on this? a resolution on this would really help. Thanks in advance!

safeercm avatar Mar 28 '23 16:03 safeercm

Hi Dennis, thank you for your talk at libp2p day.

What about p2cp? :)

q9f avatar Nov 21 '23 14:11 q9f