Denis Maier
Denis Maier
I think we should seriously re-consider this. I know it's an old issue but it gets requested time and again. @bwiernik @bdarcus
This is what the CSL-M supplement has to say on this: The MLZ extensions to CSL permit multiple `cs:layout` elements within `cs:citation` and `cs:bibliography`. Each `cs:layout` element but the last...
> Also, if we allow multiple layout by language, are there other use cases for multiple layouts. Yes, there may be. Legal citations being one example, and Frank has solved...
Sure, but you'll have to add that to every style. If we had a modular solution you could just hook that into any style.
But concerning the proposal at stake here: You think we should add that as per CSL-M?
> This seems an important point, but I'm not understanding. Can you explain a bit more? A Jewish studies scholar might use different citation styles, e.g. Chicago author-date, Chicago note,...
Oh, sorry, must have misunderstood your question... The difference is that this ```xml ... ``` won't localize terms. It just applies some conditional logic. This ```xml ... ``` re-runs the...
No. The language always comes from item metadata. I was wrong concerning the distinction between ```xml ... ``` and ```xml ... ``` I think it's undocumented, but the variant with...
> The point of the different locale layouts is to localize the terms by item language (e.g., German items are formatted in German, English items in Englisher) and, with the...
@adam3smith Ok if this is merged?