Yves Orton

> change behavior everywhere except in its scope Do you mean what *I* said, or what Ovid wrote? I have only skimmed Ovids text so maybe I missed something. As...

> I'm referring to the feature proposed, which only involves a feature declaration in the scope where the module is required. Which as far as I understand it could be...

@Grinnz I think i get where you are coming but I think that @Ovid was a touch ambiguous in his wording and worded it such that it might be interpreted...

NOTE all of the following comments are written assuming that @Ovid will change the PPC so that this feature only affects code WITHIN the scope it is used. IMO having...

@ovid sorry to hear that. Ill edit the text as I suggested and you agreed with.

@shadowcat-mst please explain the problem you are thinking of in more detail. Assuming this is implemented the way I expect it should be I dont see how it could "make...

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 12:20, Dan Book ***@***.***> wrote: > I disagree. utf8::upgrade is a string function, so it's appropriate to > coerce its argument into a string...

On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 11:53, Dan Book ***@***.***> wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 12:20, Dan Book *@*.***> wrote: I disagree. > utf8::upgrade is a string...

https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/20661

This now works as I believe is expected, and matches PCRE etc. I am pretty sure it is nothing as elegant and efficient as it could be using the regexp...