David Kellum

I'm not surprised with that as a goal, but I can think of cases where for practical reasons I nead to dev on 1.45 nightly with expectation that it will...

I guess "robust code" is the important phrase in your comment, because in practice, the way it is currently implemented (what you documented above) works just fine (if not robustly)...

> I agree that nightly 1.45 shouldn't pass a cfg(version("1.45.0")) check. Beta should, though. This is unproductive rehash/relitigation of same issues raised during RFC. Making attempts to optimize this for...

That's lame.