Package via flatpak

[Elinvynia]

Hey, it would be great to package ldtk to be available via flatpak! I have no experience in this area otherwise I would likely just do it myself, so consider this just a friendly suggestion as I like using flatpaks.

[darltrash]

Packaging via flatpak would be amazing! I personally really dislike having to open up a terminal or a file explorer to open up LDTK instead of just doing what I always do with quite literally everything else in my toolset, alongside the fact that AppImages arent truly portable as they still depend on the libc and other things which makes LDTK completely break under MUSL-based Void Linux or Alpine Linux, for example.

[Newbytee]

I have no experience in this area otherwise I would likely just do it myself, so consider this just a friendly suggestion as I like using flatpaks.

Flathub (which I assume is where you'd want to publish it) actually requires that you as the developer of the application if they want to create a Flatpak themselves before you submit it yourself, so you're actually doing exactly the right thing even if it's by accident :)

[ghost]

Hello, I've created a Flatpak manifest ready to be submitted to Flathub. It just unpacks the AppImage and changes some stuff to make it work.

@deepnight As for the Flathub submission, I have to ask for permission an upstream app developer. So here I link my Flathub stuff: https://github.com/ondra05/flathub/tree/io.ldtk.LDtk

[poperigby]

@deepnight Do we have permission to submit LDtk to FlatHub?

[darltrash]

any updates? @deepnight