ASE use symmetry in relax, get the result faster than ABACUS

[ieiue]

Describe the bug

I made a calculation both used ASE and ABACUS. ASE completed it in less than 13 minutes, which it cost ABACUS 1h41minutes. The tow calculations have the same INPUT、KPT and STRU file. I check the numbers of kpoints and find that ASE has fewer kpoints.

Expected behavior

Can ABACUS become faster?

To Reproduce

OUT.Fe_100.zip

Environment

ABACUS v.3.6.0

Additional Context

No response

Task list for Issue attackers (only for developers)

• [ ] Verify the issue is not a duplicate.
• [ ] Describe the bug.
• [ ] Steps to reproduce.
• [ ] Expected behavior.
• [ ] Error message.
• [ ] Environment details.
• [ ] Additional context.
• [ ] Assign a priority level (low, medium, high, urgent).
• [ ] Assign the issue to a team member.
• [ ] Label the issue with relevant tags.
• [ ] Identify possible related issues.
• [ ] Create a unit test or automated test to reproduce the bug (if applicable).
• [ ] Fix the bug.
• [ ] Test the fix.
• [ ] Update documentation (if necessary).
• [ ] Close the issue and inform the reporter (if applicable).

[WHUweiqingzhou]

@maki49 could you have a look?

[maki49]

It is the same featrue needed as in #3735. Please give me some time to implement it.