deeplow

Found another one which could benefit from being tracked / listed here https://github.com/freedomofpress/securedrop-workstation/issues/1029

Interesting, [in the Qubes forum](https://forum.qubes-os.org/t/double-door-system-when-copying-files-between-qubes/26271), someone named the approach of `[qube A] -> [sanitizing in disp B] -> [qube C]` as double-door system. That makes sense, but I feel like...

Nice. I haven't given this one too much thought yet, but I think that's generally the right direction. But I think it's best to have design of how things will...

If merging this prior to https://github.com/freedomofpress/securedrop-workstation/pull/1043 we can't forget to mark `sd-proxy-dvm` as internal as well. It's a new qube in the architecture to make sd-proxy disposable.

Just came across [this test](https://github.com/freedomofpress/securedrop-workstation/blob/main/tests/test_vms_exist.py), which I think is exactly what we're looking for. What we want to do here is basically the same thing as running development smoke tests...

> sd-ci-runner — The build or test process failed This is an expected failure. It should work once https://github.com/freedomofpress/securedrop-client/pull/1677 is packaged.

Thanks for wrapping this one up.

https://github.com/freedomofpress/securedrop-workstation/issues/467 is an alternative solution.

Yep. I'm happy with that idea as long as the Qubes team is happy as well. I had kind of [mentioned this a while ago](https://github.com/freedomofpress/securedrop-workstation/issues/467#issuecomment-1986252774) as an alternative approach to...

Can someone please tag all of these conversations (#945, #467 and #942) with the provisioning tag or something more appropriate so we can easily find these various solutions to the...