Newer H5174 seems to (mostly) work

[geoffbon]

I bought a H5174 from Amazon this week and it appears to work fine as a type 5 sensor.
Link here.

From one of the answered questions it appears this is a newer model of the H5074, with an upgraded sensor.
I have a question about the battery level, it seems to have wrong values, sometimes negative, and in the below example over 100. Is this expected to be correct? Or, am I using the wrong type?

{
    "timestamp": "20210311194623",
    "mac-address": "A4:C1:38:99:FC:8B",
    "rssi": -57,
    "temperature": 42.8,
    "units": "F",
    "temperature-celsius": 6,
    "humidity": 68,
    "battery-pct": 111,
    "sensor-name": "",
    "location": "H5174 Fridge",
    "sensor-type": "5"
}

An example of a 99 debug dump:

Current local time and date: Thu Mar 11 19:08:50 2021
mac address =  A4:C1:38:99:FC:8B  location = H5174 Fridge device type = 99 advertising_packet_type = 004
==>0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 
==>0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 
==>                            0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
==>                            0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 
==>043E27020104008BFC9938C1A41B1AFF4C000215494E54454C4C495F524F434B535F48575075F2FFC2B9
==>__________ad________________________mmmmmmmmmmmmtttthhbbzbzbccrr
rssi         = -71

[geoffbon]

Ok, an update, it's my fault - it appears that it should be a type 4, this gives accurate values, and a battery value of 100%. So it's probably worth adding to your list in README.md.