Minows uses a DB to handle keys

[jbsv]

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 15610563053

Details

• 60 of 76 (78.95%) changed or added relevant lines in 6 files are covered.
• 6 unchanged lines in 2 files lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.04%) to 94.448%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
mino/minows/mod.go	26	30	86.67%
dkg/pedersen/dkg.go	22	27	81.48%
mino/minows/controller.go	5	12	41.67%
<!--	Total:	60	76

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
dkg/pedersen/dkg.go	1	97.01%
mino/minows/session.go	5	76.25%
<!--	Total:	6

Totals
Change from base Build 14840032249:	-0.04%
Covered Lines:	16894
Relevant Lines:	17887

---

💛 - Coveralls

[ineiti]

Why? What is the reason for this PR? Is there an issue attached to it?

From what I see, the private key index is only used in the tests. I propose to change the tests to use one db per instance, so you don't need to have a key-index. Because you'll also have other data in the db, so you'll need multiple dbs anyway.

[sonarqubecloud[bot]]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
76.5% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud