Decebal Suiu

@sashank I started work but nothing functional yet. I didn't know that it's a real interest for this feature, for me it's like a research work.

After I played a little bit with this concept, my opinion is that it doesn't put enough value on table. I prefer actual plugin packages (fat jar and zip with...

@JiaRG I fixed the link's url in your comment. I don't understand how apiman can help us, specially on this issue/feature. The new plugin type presented in this page is...

I will try to keep thinking about this feature and maybe in the end we will have POC. I think it is better to implement this concept in a new...

The part with the same ClassLoader for both application and plugins is the ultimate solution (I don't recommend a such solution). In such situation you need for your application a...

@karthic891 Any news on this topic? Can I help you with anything else related to this topic? If your response is no, I want to close this issue.

Maybe the simple solution in this case is to use a more complicated pattern for pluginId (a package name or groupId + artifactId). In the end is a matter of...

> because the pluginId string would have to be parsed and checked Why the pluginId string should be parsed? In the end it's about convention/rule. For example in Java Module...

> 3. If I call this method several times and get extensions, is it guaranteed that I will get the same instances? By default a new instance is created each...

I have said many times, the weaknesses of this project (and probably most of the open source projects) are documentation and test coverage (number of unit tests). Anybody that can...