Damion Dooley

So **COB:0000022 organism** stands as the new ID for organism going forward? This is because it encompasses more than OBI Organism (i.e. viruses), and less than NCBITaxon (=not quite an...

Ok, I misstepped there - not sure where I got notion that OBI organism didn't include viruses. But my point was that above @cmungall you said "Use COB:0000022". I was...

Yes! Am I to use COB:0000022 in FoodOn or ONS or whatever. Or use OBI:0100026? This ID that I'm specifying in my COB import file.

@bpeters42 You mean you would paradigm-fit those under 'processed specimen'? I'm not seeing existing equivalents there for whole organs (or plant parts, FoodOn's need). Also maybe 'specimen' would be technically...

I just realized there is likely a formal problem in defining a new entity "extracted heart", severed from its bodily context, and then trying to refer to one of its...

My point was that all the parthood that one would like to rely upon somehow with UBERON, i.e. just knowing that the heart specimen I have before me has a...

Ok, there's hope via property chain then. I'll experiment a bit. I'll see if transitivity involved in inverse relations need to be blocked somehow.

Planned process "has performer" [operator/agent/robot/device] is current relation one can use to attach to an agents. True, its "('Homo sapiens' or organization or device) and ('has role' some 'investigation agent...

Maybe a test question is whether "realizes o concretizes" has ever been used in OBO community in a non-anonymous way. i.e. has someone ever said x realizes y, and y...

I've been trying to understand this topic. Setting aside discussion of those information content entities that can be concretized as qualities, is the issue that an ICE like a protocol...