Mark Rogers

Here are test results for alt="" with aria-label https://www.powermapper.com/tests/screen-readers/labelling/img-null-alt-aria-label/

> Another possibility that we've discussed would be to change the ACT rules format to have both mandatory and optional mappings. For this rule, it would be something like: >...

@WilcoFiers We've just done some testing on 10 different browser combos on macOS and Windows (Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari, IE11 with VO, NVDA, JAWS and Narrator). When calculating language: -...

And here are the test results | Test | VO macOS 12.3/Chrome 103 | VO macOS 12.3/Safari 15.4| VO macOS 12.3/FF 102 | Chrome 103/NVDA 2021.2 | FF91/NVDA 2021.2 |...

One thing I noticed - my new link to the rotate: property is to https://www.w3.org/TR/css-transforms-2/, but the other transform functions still link to https://drafts.csswg.org/css-transforms-2 Want me to update the https://drafts.csswg.org/css-transforms-2...

That's fine. Just wanted to flag that failing SC 1.1.1 in addition to the other SCs for Example 9 is correct, so the conformance mapping cannot require that only 4.1.2,...

> I don't think area elements should fail 1.1.1, they aren't the non-text content, they are links on top of non-text content In some cases I think they are non-text...

How about wording like this: > ### Applicability > Elements where the computed value of the `letter-spacing:` property was assigned from a `letter-spacing:` declared as `!important` in a `style` attribute....

**assign** comes from here: >Once a user agent has parsed a document and constructed a document tree, it must **assign**, to every element in the tree, and correspondingly to every...

>This rule is stricter than WAI-ARIA. It doesn't map to WAI-ARIA in its requirements because of it. Instead it maps to SC 1.3.1 Ok, that makes sense, but if 1.3.1...