David Purton

@moewew , your fix seems to work fine for this MWE. I would *never* have even understood enough to get to putting in all those `\expandafter` commands. In fact I'm...

As a note, more code is needed to actually provide a robust solution. Fields that come after the `pages` field need to be handled and also different options of `citepages`...

This was by design. The handbook is super unclear on when/if full page ranges should be given for the first citation. I think I ended up always putting a full...

It seems like SBL's current recommendation is that citations never include full page ranges when there is a bibliography containing the full page range. See https://sblhs2.com/2018/02/08/citing-page-numbers-for-chapters-and-articles/ This behaviour can be...

Perhaps I should make `citepages=omit` the default. Although this would break existing documents that don't expect this behaviour.

I already have switched to `citpages=omit` in my new code. Which I think I will put up on GitHub soon!

@lyndondrake and @folofjc I just committed my new code to the v2 branch. There's no documentation and it isn't backward compatible, so don't try and build your current document with...

> Thanks! I'll try to give it a test. Do you have any suggestions on how to have both this and the old one in the same TeX installation? I...

It's the right place to ask! It's been neglected a bit, but I'll get back to it. I have some long service leave coming up in the middle of the...

Well, you aren't doing anything wrong :) I assume you're after: > N. T. Wright, “The Letter to the Romans: Introduction, Commentary, and Reflections,” *NIB* 10:400. But the style gives:...