Dan Connolly

> If we're going to keep all of the aspirational stuff, are there actually significant revisions to be made? I'm sure typos stylistic stuff, a few minor corrects exist. Is...

So I was confused when I got the impression you have rights to merge those PRs? On Fri, Oct 26, 2018, 6:46 AM Joshy Orndorff wrote: > Looks like no...

I argued against "noob" long ago too. @jimscarver agreed to some extent, but he keeps using the term.

Regarding **[weekly]**, indefinite durations are awkward, so it's important to give plenty of justification. See, for example, the "How will we measure completion?" section of #208.

Regarding rewards for meetings, advice I have received that seems wise is: reward for the results of the meetings, not just for holding meetings. So perhaps the goals here is...

Maybe use #919 for rholang stuff and re-scope this one to rnode stuff?

@ian-bloom it occurs to me that in order to complete this, we need to update the code / service behind https://member.rchain.coop/ . - Do you expect @jeremybusk to do that?...

I'm a lot more comfortable with version-controlled text formats for critical data. I suppose there's a reasonably straightforward way to dump the LDAP database and check it in somewhere...

In #428 I'm reminded you prefer multi-language wordpress for https://member.rchain.coop/ . wordpress and PHP are hopeless when it comes to object capability security. While I have experience with Capper, I...

@kitblake care to elaborate? On reflection, I don't understand exactly what motivates using LDAP over an SQL database such as the one built in to WordPress or drupal. In particular:...