Devin C. Cowan

> Went through my own derivation to double check the boundary conditions, see my notes below, but I do get to the same result as your code, but I'm just...

## Devin' Derivation **The system:** $$ \frac{\partial e_x}{\partial z} + i\omega b_y = 0 $$ $$ \frac{\partial h_y}{\partial z} + \sigma e_x = 0 $$ **Boundary condition at the top:**...

> > > Went through my own derivation to double check the boundary conditions, see my notes below, but I do get to the same result as your code, but...

Here is what I have for both Dirichlet and Neumann conditions on the top of the mesh. So we can normal the electric field (Dirichlet) or magnetic field (Neumann) to...

It's likely related to the issues I brought forward for general NSEM improvements. 1. Boundary conditions for the 1D solution, and 2. Solution using hanging edges for EM problems

> I left a few minor comments, @dccowan. Please check them out and let me know what do you think. > > I see that coverage is missing L782-L783 in...

> I left a few minor comments, @dccowan. Please check them out and let me know what do you think. > > I see that coverage is missing L782-L783 in...

> I feel like this should just be moved to a utility function outside of any of the `static` or `natural_source` modules. Having the same function defined in many locations...

I noticed something important about these projections functions. When originally developed for DC/IP, the projection ensured the final electrode locations didn't end up on an 'exposed' edge or corner of...

> > I noticed something important about these projections functions. When originally developed for DC/IP, the projection ensured the final electrode locations didn't end up on an 'exposed' edge or...