Dylan Baker
And I just realized that there's another case that isn't handled here that has to be handled, which is recursive dependencies, and after a quick test I found that that...
> Yes, but does it have a compiler flag for "write module files, whatever their name, in directory X"? All the examples that I see do not have that and...
Right, that would need to be per file rather than per target. Which, I admit is not ideal, but at least it's closer than what GCC and MSVC have, and...
I ran the last 4 commits, through time to see what the actual run time for the "8 module names" test, to demonstrate the difference in compile time. I ran...
If you're not ready for review or to land could you convert the PR to a draft? that helps people know what the current state of the PR is
I'm not opposed to adding a module with support equivalent to cpack or xmake pack, I'd even review it if someone wrote it. I don't think any of the core...
I don't know that it's import, I can always rename the module in 11885 if we ever have agreement on adding that module, it could be named `options` for example;...
I had thought about having `machines : ['build', 'host']` as an option, but in that case I thought the better solution is to return a special type that can act...
or possibly `machine: Literal['host', 'build', 'both'] = 'host'`
among other things, yes. but also 'both' is more ergonomic than `[host_machine, build_machine]`