Dylan Baker
I've also reworded a few of the commit messages to fix typos, but I'll wait to re-push so I don't flood the CI
Squashed and re-ordered a bit to address comments from IRC/Matrix. Attempting to fix the one test that is failing on Windows
@bonzini, You also took a stab at this in the past, so I thought you might be interested
We're kinda in between a rock an a hard place. Our options seem to be: 1. accept the b_sanitize is useless and deprecate it, make it harder for developers and...
That would actually be fairly trivial to do in meson++ with it's IR, lol. I think that would be quite challenging for an interpreter though, there isn't a clean, easy...
for MesonVersionStringHolder that's a small amount of technical debt for a huge payoff. I wonder if it's worth the additional technical debt. Maybe it would be easier to add `in`...
I've rebased this and done the 0.61 -> 0.62 and 0.62 -> 0.63 dance. I think there's probably still a few CI failures to sort out. But, let's talk about...
My thought for `b_sanitize2` (or `b_sanitize_array`?) is that it would return an array, while `b_sanitize` would continue to return a string which would always match the values we guarantee, so...
yup, that makes sense to me. I'll do that.
Ideally this would have a follow up of "don't build targets that aren't installed by default", so that if you had helper libraries only used in tests those also wouldn't...