David Burles

Results 138 comments of David Burles

Maybe add the ability to give names to the local collections?

In that case you would also provide a ref on instantiation just like above. Will that not work in your case?

Maybe add the ability to give names to the local collections?

Hmm, can you confirm that arbitrary options make it through to `addExtension`?

Maybe add the ability to give names to the local collections?

I think it should be alright, you will specify the `ref` option for null collections, as well as any collections that are on a different connection. Perhaps `Mongo.Collection.getRef('...')` is better?

Maybe add the ability to give names to the local collections?

That will solve this outstanding issue: https://github.com/dburles/mongo-collection-instances/issues/22

Maybe add the ability to give names to the local collections?

Though it would be possible to overwrite a `ref` if we later define a collection with the same name which may be confusing?. The advantage of using `getRef`means the two...

Maybe add the ability to give names to the local collections?

Let's go with just `get`, happy for you to continue with the PR along with some tests for the new functionality

Maybe add the ability to give names to the local collections?

I agree, though it's not entirely working, see here: https://github.com/dburles/mongo-collection-instances/issues/22

Maybe add the ability to give names to the local collections?

Possibly. Let's continue discussion on the PR.

It have problem with "collection hook" or not?

Hey @thearabbit not sure I understand exactly, could you give an example of what you're wanting to do?

It have problem with "collection hook" or not?

Is there an incompatibility between this package and `matb33:collection-hooks` ?