Results 245 comments of Daniel

I'm not sure with the current Parse JS SDK can use `fromJSON` to save data: ``` it('from json save data', async (done) => { const json = { className :...

Should be fixed by using the JS SDK master and: ``` const object = Parse.Object.fromJSON(json, false, true); ```

If you rewrite your test using the third parameter of `fromJSON` (dirty - whether keys should be saved), the test will pass: ```javascript it('afterEvent should work with date', async done...

It is a new parameter recently released with V3 of the JS SDK, so that fromJSON can save data. Without it, no keys are set to `dirty`, so no data...

Closed via https://github.com/parse-community/Parse-SDK-JS/pull/1293

What do we have to do to get this merged @mtrezza? This unit test is 2x as fast with these changes, and these pointers are only one level down: ```...

Yep, it would be a substitute for a more secure way to connect as `master`. This is inspired by mongoDB atlas' ability to use a X.509 cert instead of a...

I'm not sure how it would work to be honest. The idea is similar to using [X509 certificates with mongoDB](https://www.mongodb.com/docs/manual/tutorial/configure-x509-client-authentication/). I'm not quite sure how it would be implemented.

Thank you for your reply here @cbaker6. In my view, it shouldn't be up to the developer to custom code a solution for the SDK to work as expected with...

If this technically can't be solved on the SDK side because the use of `struct`, maybe the solution is to override `dirtyKeys` in `RestWrite` if `object.key === original.key`. I've discussed...