Daniel Bluhm
Daniel Bluhm
> What is the difference between askar and askar-anoncreds? could we see some alignment eventually? Ideally we can get rid of the wallet-type entirely and just use askar? > `askar-anoncreds`...
Okay, I think we have a consensus. I'll reword the issue title to reflect that. I'll see where this fits into other planned and ongoing refactors.
No; the challenge with this is that there is potentially more than one VM ID per DID. When signing a VC (either through the VC API or when issuing using...
@PatStLouis please reivew (I couldn't formally request your review for some reason)
Because of the changes to the selection strategy from 3138, it's possible I haven't fully accounted for the original issue yet. I will take a closer look. I suspect we...
@jamshale your input on BDD interop test failure would be appreciated. Is this an OWF migration artifact or something else?
I need to fix unit tests. Changes should be captured and tested at least in the json-ld scenario integration test but might be interesting/a good idea to have a more...
Unit tests fixed; this PR is ready for final review and merge
I stewed on how best to handle the OOB invitation attachments for these v1 protocols when they're no longer in the core repo. I think the way I would approach...
I've rebased this PR on current main and resolved merge conflicts. My last comment about restoring the ability to attach v1 credential offers or presentation requests to OOB are still...