Dave Berenbaum
Dave Berenbaum
I took a closer look to document this, and I agree with @courentin that the current behavior is unexpected/unhelpful: 1. For data that has no `remote` field, it makes sense...
Note that documenting that it's not supported should be sufficient to close this for now (although not ruling out that we may want to revisit it in the future).
Closing this since the docs explain what's supported. Support for different sweeper configuration if needed can be in a new issue.
@daavoo What's the status of this?
I think it makes sense to have a separate status like `Remote only` or `Missing from local` with the suggestion to `dvc pull` in the case where the data is...
Related: https://github.com/iterative/dvc/issues/5151 It would be nice to give users an option to setup the merge driver during `dvc init`. I understand we may not want to automatically touch user's Git...
That all sounds right @mvkvc
@efiop Although I haven't used status extensively, I agree that it intuitively makes sense as a flag for that command. I also agree with your final analysis that it probably...
tl;dr It's on our roadmap but not close enough to give an estimate for it yet. A lot of the functionality today is part of `dvc status`. Our plan is...
Sorry, I still don't have an estimate. It remains on our backlog because we have been focusing on rehauling a lot of the data management and haven't been able to...