David Barnett
David Barnett
Awesome, yeah, we should definitely support this style!
I just ran into the same! I was hoping I could give it an explicit name to detect an `s:Func` the same way other directives like `@dict` work, but it...
Rather than adding a new vimdoc directive and creating potentially confusing scenarios where one .vim file pulls in another, one option would be to create a vimdoc.cfg or vimdoc.json file...
Ooh, I didn't even realize backticks were supported syntax. Wish they had official help to document exactly which syntax was supported instead of just having to read through the syntax...
These may be non-trivial to fix because they all stem from the fact that vimdoc's model is currently too simplistic: it creates multiple independent blocks and has no concept of...
Yep, a few approaches that came to mind: * Don't skip inbox (based on some thread criteria?) but use something like `in:inbox -label:0unprocessed` as your default inbox view? — Lots...
Totally, these more involved rule structures need some kind of chained logic, which sounds like the same set of problems I had in mind for "next action". FWIW, "no action"...
Individual rules makes more sense to me. Just needs a little thought about how to "spell" it.
If I were going to set up nice testing, do you have any preferred strategy or framework in mind that I could start setting up?
For me testAll fails with various errors about missing ES6 features if not using the V8 engine but I have different problems preventing me from using V8: Script Editor's "Run...