Antonio Davi Macedo Coelho de Castro

Maybe. You can set it via `CoreManager.set('REQUEST_ATTEMPT_LIMIT', retry);`

That makes sense. Would you be willed to continue this PR?

I like the idea of having some way to send a batch from the JS SDK but I am not sure if the proposed API is the best one. I'd...

No.. there is no way to do it. Since the Parse Server can run in multiple processes at the same time, there is no warranty that two requests will go...

Yes. That's the idea. We will probably need the abort in the client side as well to revert the object states.

I think that your original idea of changing saveAll, destroyAll makes sense, will be a lot easier and a very good first step. Why don't you start with them?

Great job. It is a good start for sure. I've just left a comment over there.

@dplewis any thoughts? I'm afraid of having counter effects with this change. @fastrde tests are also failing. Also, why don't you just use `obj._toFullJSON()`. @dplewis maybe we could think about...

You can check here: https://travis-ci.com/github/parse-community/Parse-SDK-JS/jobs/442423259 There are lint issues and a failing test case. Talking about the pointers, I believe that's the expected behavior for referenced objects. To have them...

Passing the Parse SDK to Parse Server via a configuration option makes sense to me. It looks that it could solve this problem and it would be helpful for other...