David Schneider

Best guess would be #148 , but the CHT fail as well and I haven't touched these parts.

I think I got the reason: #148 introduced a new base class including an additional `make` target. If I understand the workflow correctly, the systemtest compares the build log (which...

Might be related though. The diff comparison for the result files prints no further diffs on the console. Or do you have any more detailed information about the differences?

I just checked the OpenFOAM-adapter changes locally using the perpendicular-flap test case and deal.II. I ran the current develop state of the openfoam-adapter against 290a26cad7173bc4e55e81423004fc1ab82fbbda - `diff precice-Solid-watchpoint-Flap-Tip.log openfoam-develop-watchpoint.log` (of...

> Could you maybe also compare to master? _hm_ could do that, but are you aware that 290a26c passed in travis?

Some notes: - the test already failed in the respective float double update https://github.com/precice/systemtests/pull/275 - for the precice*iteration files, the reference is outdated due to a more comprehensive output by...

Coming to an end here: the precision of the reference vtk (17) data still differs from the one I generate with preCICE v2.2 (18): ```diff 9,87c9,87 < -5.0000000000000003e-02 0.0000000000000000e+00 0.0000000000000000e+00...

This is a good point. We currently categorize the solver according to the pressure dimension, which is obviously not sufficient in case of a multi-phase problem.

A bit sad that it will take quite a while until these usability changes reach the user.

Yes sure, there is not that much work included. The main question for me is here: Should we raise a warning like 'you can just use FSI and nearest projection...