David Carlisle

Note that while I agree users should be able to change this, the association isn't just in legacy tex fonts, `ℑ` and `ℑ` both give ℑ in HTML for example.

Yes thanks I can reproduce (this is mostly a hyperref issue rather than unicode-math)

On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 12:09, thirs wrote: > Ok... thanks for your answer. Would you please mind explaining why hoping > to use ᵥ instead of _{v} is...

\cdots is traditionally (almost uniquely) \mathinner (apart from \leftt\right only cdots, ldots and ddtots are \mathinner by default) unicode-math leaves that alone, and defines U+22EF to be \unicodecdots (again the...

\mathcode"8000 would be safer than active, not least that it wouldn't affect its use in text. I think you would then define it to be a \mathinner of a normal...

there are several things conspiring to make your example not work, compared to this version which does work ``` \documentclass{article} \usepackage{unicode-math} \setmathfont{Stix Two Math} \begin{document} \Umathcodenum`ħ=`ħ hbar: $\hbar$ hbar unicode...

It probably isn't the proper way , but it works, without having to look up the character number,making the character come from the font in fam 0 (and act like...

unicode.xml is my file:-) actually the latest (Uniocde 13) version is https://w3c.github.io/xml-entities/unicode.xml 210F has ``` EF68 \hslash \hslash ``` 0127 has ``` E2EB \Elzxh ``` note the lack of a...

rather than add lots of language options to this package it (might) be more flexible to just add some indirection here using the standard `\...name` convention so rather than directly...

@lvjr yes apart from keeping your package less cluttered (you could end up with a lot of language code if you start adding some) it ends up with a better...