David Anthoff
David Anthoff
> Ok, this doesn't work. Why not? I mean, yes, it is cumbersome, but we do need these `try catch` blocks, right? Fully on board to not add those all...
> Just putting the handler into a try-catch (we're already doing that) gives the user the same info and still shouldn't break anything. We need to distinguish between errors that...
Yes, it is a pain, but I think that is just what it is for infrastructure code like ours that interacts with user code and wants to be robust in...
I think you are looking at two unrelated things: the first screenshot is language server related, but the second one is just the REPL, the two have no relationship. On...
I think I've finally am getting clarity what I'm thinking about this, see https://github.com/JuliaLang/juliaup/issues/830.
I'm closing this for now, as I don't think we will go with this kind of solution.
I'm closing this as a duplicate of https://github.com/JuliaLang/juliaup/issues/1184. Just to note, the error messages here are a bit misleading, I have an explanation of what is causing this in the...
> if you're vendoring JuliaSyntax and other libs, you're already messing with their Project.toml's No, we are not messing with anything inside the packages that we are using in the...
@TonyLianLong any idea?
Bump, I'd love to see this merged!