David Bar-On

Are you using some `iperf3` **script** that is running iperf3? I am asking since there are at least two wrong parameters: `--R` should be `-R` and `-A` format is `-A...

By testing on my machine using `-P 24 -i 0.1`, it seems that there is a memory leak related to statistics reports. I am not sure whether this is a...

Submitted PR #1814 with a suggested fix for the memory leak. > I'm curious as to when this latest master will be pushed to a released version? PR #1787 was...

This is indeed a strange behavior. It may be that about 11,000 is 3 hours (10,800 sec) but I was not able to find anything related in the iperf3 code....

I believe that this issue was already fixed by PR #1805 which was merged into the master branch (but is **not** yet in an official release).

> In udp I also see sum key with is not clear for what purpose. Per [this code](https://github.com/esnet/iperf/blob/d1409d0e95b5e859e500313e6b28943ee94367ee/src/iperf_api.c#L4286-L4298) in `iperf_print_results`, the "sum" clause for backward compatibility as it was confusing,...

> I took a look at this [discussion(https://github.com/esnet/iperf/discussions/1541), but the env that I'm using doesn't buffer anything. The issue is probably still explained in the discussion you found, specifically in...

Its difficult to tell what exactly is going on without traffic logs (e.g. using Wireshark). However, since version 3.16 iperf3 is multi-threaded, and the control messages are sent between different...

> ... shouldn't there be no packets send after the TEST_END has been received. This is not present on earlier versions. As I wrote above, this did not happen in...

Submitted PR #1868 that should fix this issue. @FlamurMustafa, can you re-test using the code form the PR?