david-navapbc
david-navapbc
talked with @arnejduranovic and @JFisk42 today to get some clarity on the flow involving `FhirTransformSchemaElementAction.DELETE` refactored `FHIRReceiverFilter.evaluateObservationConditionFilters()` to reduce redundant code and improve algorithmic efficiency. all existing tests are still...
PR up. As per scope of ticket I left most of the things alone. I did validate the flow has a robust set of tests and I did refactor the...
we're going a different direction with this but we wanted to save the work I did - which is here in this draft pr https://github.com/CDCgov/prime-reportstream/pull/15814
I created the mapping file and am working on creating a functioning test. That entails creating good sample data that has the AUI field populated
worked with @JFisk42 to create valid HL7 message for testing. FHIR message can't be created and we can't test Hl7 message yet because we don't have segment "IN1" mapped. Will...
**THE SCOPE OF THIS TICKET HAS CHANGED AND IT HAS BEEN RE-POINTED TO FROM 2 TO 5** As I dug into the ticket it became clear we can't complete the...
yesterday was mostly Nava internal work. getting back to this today. I have some questions for @JFisk42. The sample message is made but some of the mapping plumbing is still...
more nava internal work has been put on my plate. juggling this and that at the same time.
made updates as per @JFisk42 's recommendations. Will continue to complete work
@JFisk42 showed me how the top level fields in the Coverage file need to cite FHIR extension vs the HL7 fields in AUI. He also asked me to change the...