Dave Horton

can you share the drachtio log file from your attempt at setting the transport, because that should work. Please have drachtio loglevel at debug

its saying there are 15 possible transports which is a bit strange ``` SipTransport::findAppropriateTransport - after filtering for transport we have 15 candidates ``` Can you restart drachtio, with loglevel...

That code looks correct to me at first glance. Are you saying it is working now? If so please close the issue, it not please provide sip traces

I think you are incorrect about the uri being invalid ``` NOTIFY sip:192.168.0.109:45456;transport=udp SIP/2.0 ``` is a valid request line. Beyond that, I do not understand the change that you...

Let's be clear first of all that there is no violation of RFC 3261. Secondly, the uri appears exactly as you formatted it in the `srf.request` command

Do you mean that you are not seeing the ACK reach the server? That would be strange, could you provide a drachtio log file from your test call showing same?

I'm unclear which direction the REGISTERs are going -- are you wanting the drachtio proxy to receive REGISTERs from clients and distribute them across freeswitches (similar to INVITEs) ?

I am thinking that you want the drachtio app to be an outbound proxy -- to proxy REGISTER requests on to the Freeswitch after adding a Path: header, so that...

The only reason the app should send a 403 response to a REGISTER is if the source address is in a black-listed range for some reason. Could you paste in...

sorry I was on holiday last week. The logs I wanted to see where when the 403 is actually sent....seems like you only posted the logs from when the app...