Dave Horton

Sorry for the late response. I think if you want to wait for one party hanging up, the `dlg.on('destroy',..` is the way to do it. I usually have a handler...

I'd love to see it as a pull request in order to evaluate it. I'm not sure why you are unable to submit a PR - I've had others do...

just checking in...would still love to see a PR from you on this if you are still interested..

I am working on a fix for this (finally!). I've made an attempt in drachtio-srf@ 4.4.49-beta.2 This has an enhancement to the `dlg.modify()` function You can use it in the...

So the scenario is ``` -- INVITE ------> ``` Is that correct? When you say "needs to wait" on the UPDATE request, that sounds strange since you presumably can't expect...

Right now, drachtio does not support receiving an UPDATE during the initial INVITE transaction. I will be looking into supporting this. However, once the dialog is established, if you receive...

I'm not clear on the callflow you are imagining. Is it this: 1. Caller sends INVITE to drachtio 2. drachtio sends 100 Trying 3. drachtio sends INVITE to Callee 4....

Thank you for the callflow and the reference to the RFC. I think this is something I need to add support to the drachtio server to. Would you have the...

The only events that the endpoint registers for by default are these: ``` const EVENTS_OF_INTEREST = [ 'CHANNEL_EXECUTE', 'CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE', 'CHANNEL_PROGRESS_MEDIA', 'CHANNEL_CALLSTATE', 'CHANNEL_ANSWER', 'CUSTOM conference::maintenance' ]; ``` However, I recently added...

Hi there! These definitely seem like possible race conditions. I had not considered (1) before, and (2) sounds like an oversight on my part. Will look into them and update...