Dave Cramer

I haven't had a chance to review all of this but we can ignore the failing tests as we know what that is now. I think https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/blob/master/docs/documentation/head/use.md does need to...

so after the first pass of reviewing this can you break this up into at least 2 PR's The first one would be where you are refactoring existing code without...

@MarekUniq can. you break this up into multiple PR's ? As it is it is a bit too big to properly review.

> @davecramer Technically I can. It will be 5th version I will create over a half+ year period. I would like to avoid 6th, 7th etc version. Do you have...

closing this in favour of smaller PR's

Unfortunately the driver is synchronous. Making the driver asynchronous is a pretty big blocker here. Curious how would you even use this in the JDBC model ? You would need...

I'm not even sure how you would use this in JDBC? It's not asynchronous at all

Good catch, I hadn't thought about the batching stuff. It would certainly be non-standard. The question becomes who has the bandwidth to implement this ?

I think the idea here is that if you have one large column its likely you would read it more than once. Perhaps @atuldaemon can explain why this is a...

@vlsi fsir enough. I agree the setting should be a connection property. That said this seems to be something we should discuss the correct solution to On Wed, Mar 6,...