David Müller

@rodchenkov thanks a lot for the repro. We already fixed this with PR #1647. Your repro helped me now to confirm that it's already fixed in our nightly build. A...

> Hello ! > > Latest SonarQube expects all the lines to be covered https://community.sonarsource.com/t/sonarqube-not-showing-coverage-for-inherited-record/107476 I'm not sure whether they should be marked as covered or not > > ...

@Steve-OH, @Rast1234 I think I now found one of the issues here. Starting from the sample code @Steve-OH provided. If I add the primary constructor parentheses, the generated report contains...

The issue says something about increased instrumentation time but e.g. we don't use Json serialization/deserialization for the instrumentation at all. In fact we only use it in 1-2 places for...

Mhh can't really figure out why the tests fail. On my local build they all pass. The stack trace of the build job logged out doesn't show info about the...

@WojciechNagorski Thanks but I would love to see what doesn't match. As I said when I run the tests locally on my machine the ```approved``` and ```received``` files match. Could...

Ok it seems there is still a problem with mocking ```Affinity```, ```Jit``` and ```Platform```. I will fix it and push another commit. 

So I now removed the tests because I can't get them running without destroying the immutability of the ```EnvironmentResolver```. If someone could help out and give me some advise on...

I guess I need some additional feedback/help here. The main problem is that I still don't fully understand how it is intended to implement `IDataCollectorAttachmentProcessor`. I see it beeing executed...

Thanks for reporting. Like @MarcoRossignoli already mentioned in the linked issue. We currently don't have support for `Microsoft.Testing.Platform` yet. But we already discussed adding the support and collected some strategies...