maps icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
maps copied to clipboard

Old SOI index map shapefile projections seem wrong.

Open ramSeraph opened this issue 3 years ago • 5 comments

Both the old and new SOI projection files are in wgs84 and look like they match. This seems off to me.

https://github.com/datameet/maps/blob/master/Survey-of-India-Index-Maps/OSM_UTM_WGS84/OSM_50K_Index.prj

GEOGCS["GCS_WGS_1984",DATUM["D_WGS_1984",SPHEROID["WGS_1984",6378137.0,298.257223563]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0.0],UNIT["Degree",0.0174532925199433]]

https://github.com/datameet/maps/blob/master/Survey-of-India-Index-Maps/OldSystem_Everest_Polyconic/OldSystem_50K_Index.prj

GEOGCS["GCS_WGS_1984",DATUM["D_WGS_1984",SPHEROID["WGS_1984",6378137.0,298.257223563]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0.0],UNIT["Degree",0.0174532925199433]]

ramSeraph avatar Jul 30 '22 22:07 ramSeraph

The best source of information on the old indian datum i have found so far is at https://deeppradhan.heliohost.org/

ramSeraph avatar Jul 30 '22 22:07 ramSeraph

Can you help me understand exactly what is the problem?

The purpose of these two files is to help someone figure out what Toposheet a location falls in.

The New UTM based OSM maps are in WGS84 datatum anyway, so the projection for that seems fine to me.

While the Older Toposheets were in the Everest or Modified Everest Datum, the files in the https://github.com/datameet/maps/blob/master/Survey-of-India-Index-Maps/OldSystem_Everest_Polyconic folder are just for the sake of figuring out which toposheet a location falls in. We do not take the datum shift into account for this purpose.

devdattaT avatar Jul 31 '22 05:07 devdattaT

Given that the shapefile for the Old system advertises the datum as WGS84 in the .prj file, I was hoping the datum shift calculations were taken into account.

I am trying to look for a source where I don't have to do those calculations myself :)

ramSeraph avatar Jul 31 '22 09:07 ramSeraph

In the end I am looking for the list of older 1:50000 toposheets which cover the missing/unreleased newer 1:50000 OSM toposheets.

ramSeraph avatar Jul 31 '22 10:07 ramSeraph

To be clear, the only actionable item here would be documentation.. or may be moving the files to a plain json file instead of a shapefile.

ramSeraph avatar Jul 31 '22 10:07 ramSeraph